Risks associated with the use of the big fool theory

math
(© Sashkin–stock.adobe.com)

The Big Fool Theory, also known as the Inverted U Theory, is a simple yet powerful principle of investing that states that when an investor is willing to risk losing it all, the best strategy is to invest all of their money in a stock. Suppose an investor thinks that leaning into excess inventory will produce the most profit for an extended period of time. It is better to risk losing everything than to refuse to participate in such a strategy and hope for the best. This theory can be twisted. For example, some investors may believe that shorting a stock is the ideal trading strategy, even if it is risky. Additionally, some traders may see the theory as a license to trade, where putting all their money in one stock is just a convention to follow. However, the use of this theory carries risks that must be taken into account.

It’s not always easy to find the next fool

In a market where prices are rising, it is difficult to find stocks cheap enough to satisfy investors who buy them and end up losing money. However, if the market is down, it is not easy to find stocks whose prices will rise enough for investors to earn future profits. This implies a period during which investors must wait before buying or selling stocks.

It’s easy to forget the future ain’t what it used to be

In the past, when an investor sold a stock at a high price, they were guaranteed to make a profit. Unfortunately, that no longer holds up in today’s market, where hindsight seems to make sense of the past while applying it as a lesson for us in the present and the future. In reality, however, things change rapidly over time, so even the fundamentals of stocks may not support their current prices compared to their value twenty years ago. This reality has profound implications for those who try to use the concept of “Big Fool Theory.” This is because when the price of a stock goes up, there may be fools who will buy it, but there may also be no fool insight.

The real world is not a zero-sum game

This theory assumes that investing in stocks is a zero-sum game: someone else will lose money if an investor makes money by selling stocks. In reality, however, this situation does not always occur and depends on the number of investors participating in the transaction. The more buyers and sellers there are in a market, the greater the sum of profit and loss. This is because they will balance out, which means no one will make a profit or suffer a loss.

There are no guarantees in the business

Some investment strategies involve gambling that claims to guarantee investors gains from risk-free transactions. Unfortunately, investing involves risk instead of outright gambling, where any transaction comes with some level of uncertainty in exchange for potential gain. The theory is based on the fact that even though money may be lost during a stock market decline, there will always be those who buy the stocks of investors who participate in sell-offs at high prices. However, if there are not enough buyers for an investor’s stock, desperation will ensue.

The price of a stock can be higher than its intrinsic value

When the price of a stock rises, it reflects an investor’s desire to buy at a high price, not necessarily the actual value of the stock. For example, suppose an investor paid $100 for a stock worth $100. This can be due to many factors, such as the company’s reputation in the market or its potential for future earnings. However, suppose the same company experiences a rapid rise in its share price without any pronounced improvement in its operations or technology. It is reasonable to assume that people are buying this stock for other reasons and not on its actual value as determined by market participants.

There are no strict rules in the market

The theory may work for some investors, but it doesn’t necessarily work for others. The reason for this is that different investors have different investment strategies, including some who take advantage of this theory by buying stocks at high prices and selling them back at low prices later in the market. Moreover, there are no hard and fast rules in the market as to why the price of a particular stock rises or falls at certain times. Instead, it depends on many factors, such as how other investors react to information about a company that is released repeatedly over time.

The theory does not apply to all companies

It is widely accepted that this theory does not apply equally to all companies in the market due to the differences between different industries and business structures. For example, some industries are dominated by family businesses whose ownership is passed down from one generation to the next; this means that it becomes difficult for foreigners to buy shares, except through an initial public offering (IPO) or mergers and acquisitions (M&A). On the other hand, more and more investors are choosing to buy stocks directly from companies in other sectors instead of relying on this theory. Examples include technology stocks and commodity companies such as oil and gold mines.

Investors need to know when to exit

This theory calls for investors to sell their stocks after making large profits in the market. Investors should not exaggerate on this theory, however, as it is possible that the price of a stock will fall after taking their profits and investing more money in another project that does not seem cheap enough to them. On the other hand, if an investor does not sell his shares after a big profit from his previous investments, he risks being called “crazy” by others.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the big fool theory is a useful tool for investors, but its application must be done knowing when not to use it. It’s a fool’s game to assume that every investment will increase in value, especially when it comes to stocks and publicly traded companies.

History of Hari Babu

Sharon D. Cole